MCP vs A2A Comparison

MCP vs A2A: Understanding Context Protocols for AI Systems

By DevRel As ServiceMarch 24, 202515 min read

This is an interactive blog post with detailed information about the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol. Navigate using the table of contents on the side.

01. Introduction

Standard ways to handle context help AI applications manage and share information. This makes AI tools more advanced, consistent, and useful.

As AI models get better, how well they understand and remember context during conversations greatly affects their performance and dependability. This is especially true for large language models (LLMs). LLMs need good context to give responses that make sense, are relevant, and offer help.

Older methods for managing context were often disorganized and varied. This created a situation where different applications handled context in unique ways. This inconsistency caused problems for developers, made it hard for systems to work together, and limited what AI applications could do.

To fix these issues, standard ways for managing context and enabling AI collaboration have appeared. Two important examples are the Model Context Protocol (MCP), which standardizes how AI applications access data and tools, and the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol, which aims to enable independent AI agents to communicate and work together. These protocols offer clear methods for handling information and coordinating actions, paving the way for AI applications that are more developed, logical, and effective.

Context Management Evolution

Figure 1: Evolution of context management approaches in AI systems

This guide looks at both MCP and A2A: what they are for, how they are built, and how they are used in real situations. If you are a developer wanting to use these protocols, a product manager thinking about their benefits, or just curious about how AI will handle context in the future, this guide will give you a clear understanding of these important technologies.

After reading this guide, you will know:

  • What MCP and A2A are and why they are important
  • The main ideas and structure of each protocol
  • How these protocols operate
  • Examples of their use in real products
  • The main differences between MCP and A2A, and how they can work together
  • What's next for context protocols in AI

Let's start by looking at what the Model Context Protocol (MCP) is and why it is a big step forward for AI context management.

02. What is MCP?

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard that helps AI applications connect to various data sources and tools. Think of it like a universal adapter. It provides a consistent way for AI to get the information it needs. This information can include chat history, data from business tools, or content from code repositories, all to help AI work better.

"MCP helps solve a key problem for AI: how to access and organize information from different places in a simple, dependable, and expandable way."

MCP solves a basic problem for AI applications: how to get and structure information from different places consistently and reliably, so systems can grow. Before MCP, developers often built their own ways to handle this. This led to many different methods that didn't work well together, making it hard for AI systems to connect and share information.

ComponentDescription
MCP HostAn application (like an AI tool or IDE) that uses MCP to get data.
MCP ServerA program that makes specific data or capabilities available through the MCP standard. It connects to data sources like files or databases.
MCP ClientThe part of an MCP Host that talks to an MCP Server to exchange information.
ResourcesThe actual data or content that MCP Servers provide to AI applications (e.g., files, database entries, tool outputs).

Why MCP is Important:

  • 1
    Standard Connection: MCP offers one common way for AI to connect to many different data sources, like files, databases, or online services. This means developers don't have to build custom links for each one.
  • 2
    Better AI Responses: By giving AI easy access to the right information, MCP helps AI models give more accurate, relevant, and helpful answers.
  • 3
    Flexibility: Applications using MCP can more easily switch between different AI models or vendors without rebuilding data connections.
  • 4
    Growing System: There is a growing collection of ready-to-use MCP servers for popular tools and systems, making it faster to connect AI to new data.
  • 5
    Open Standard: MCP is an open protocol, encouraging community contributions and wide use across different AI tools and platforms.

Note: MCP is an active standard

MCP is being actively developed. While this article gives an overview, always check the official MCP website for the latest details and specifications.

MCP Architecture Overview

Figure 2: High-level idea of an MCP-based system showing how data can flow and parts can connect. This diagram is one way to picture it; official MCP documentation details the client-server architecture.

03. Why MCP is Important 💡

The Model Context Protocol helps with several big challenges in making AI. This makes it a useful step forward for people who build and use AI applications. Knowing these benefits shows why many in the AI field are interested in MCP.

Managing Different Kinds of Information

Modern AI applications often need to handle many types of information at once for complex interactions.

AI applications (MCP Hosts) often need context such as:

  • 1
    Conversation History: Keeping track of past messages for smooth dialogues. An MCP Host might store this itself or get it from an MCP Server.
  • 2
    User Details: Remembering user-specific information (like settings) to make interactions feel personal. This data can be provided via an MCP Server.
  • 3
    Task Progress: Following progress on tasks that have many steps. An MCP Server could provide updates on task status from another system.
  • 4
    External Data: Using information from databases, web services (APIs), or other places, made accessible by MCP Servers.
  • 5
    Tool Use: Interacting with external tools (like a calculator or calendar) made available by an MCP Server.

MCP offers a standard way for AI applications (Hosts) to get these different kinds of information (as Resources) from various MCP Servers. This makes it easier to build advanced applications that can have sensible and useful conversations.

Standardization and Interoperability

Before MCP: Challenges

  • Fragmentation: Different systems using incompatible approaches to context handling.
  • Duplication of Effort: Developers repeatedly solving the same context management problems.
  • Integration Challenges: Difficulty connecting different AI components due to incompatible context formats.

With MCP: Benefits

  • Systems Work Together: Different AI tools and parts of a system can share information easily using the MCP standard.
  • More Tools and Services: It's easier for others to create tools and services that connect with systems using MCP.
  • Faster Development: Developers can build new features for their AI apps instead of creating basic context-handling methods from scratch.

MCP Standardization Benefits

Figure 1: How MCP's standard approach helps turn separate, different methods into a connected system.

Tool Integration

A key feature of modern AI is using external tools and services. MCP makes this easier by providing standard ways for AI applications (Hosts) to use Tools offered by MCP Servers.

FeatureDescriptionBenefit of MCP's Approach
Standard Tool DefinitionsMCP Servers describe their Tools in a common way (name, what they do, what inputs they need).Simpler to make and understand how to use Tools.
Structured Tool UseClear way for an AI Host to ask an MCP Server to use a Tool and get results back.Dependable Tool actions and result handling.
Context with ToolsInformation is passed consistently when Tools are used, helping the AI stay on track.Clear interactions even when using multiple Tools.
Finding ToolsMCP can support ways for AI Hosts to find out what Tools an MCP Server offers.AI can choose Tools based on the situation.

This standardized approach to tool integration makes it easier to build AI applications that can interact with the external world, access information, and perform actions on behalf of users.

Better Experience for Users

In the end, the technical pluses of MCP lead to real improvements for people using the AI.

More Sensible Interactions

AI systems can keep track of context better. This means conversations feel more natural and AI gives more helpful replies.

AI Can Do More

Integration with external tools and services expands what AI systems can do for users.

Personalization

Better context management enables more personalized experiences based on user history and preferences.

Reliability

Standardized approaches to context handling reduce errors and inconsistencies in AI behavior.

Key Takeaway

By addressing these fundamental challenges in AI development, MCP enables the creation of more sophisticated, coherent, and capable AI applications that can better serve users' needs.

In the next section, we'll explore the core concepts of MCP in more detail, providing a deeper understanding of how the protocol works and what components it includes.

04. How MCP Works: Key Ideas 🧩

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) uses a few main ideas to help AI applications get and use information. Knowing these ideas is important for using MCP well.

Client-Server Model: Hosts, Servers, and Resources

MCP works like a USB port for AI. It uses a client-server setup. AI applications (Hosts) connect to MCP Servers to get data (Resources).

  • MCP Hosts: These are AI applications, like AI-powered coding tools or chatbots. They use MCP to ask for information.
  • MCP Servers: These are programs that connect to data sources (like databases, files, or other apps) and make that data available through the MCP standard. Many pre-built servers exist for common systems like GitHub or Slack.
  • Resources: This is the actual data or content (like files, code snippets, or chat messages) that an MCP Server provides to an MCP Host. The AI uses these resources to understand context.

This setup allows an AI application (Host) to connect to many different MCP Servers, getting the specific information (Resources) it needs for a task from each one, all using the same MCP standard.

Sharing Conversation History and Other Data

How it Works

  • What it is: MCP allows AI applications to send and receive various types of data, including sequences of messages from a conversation.
  • Why it's useful: This helps the AI remember what was said earlier, keeping conversations on track and making sense.
  • Example Data: Information shared can include the messages, who sent them (user or AI), and when they were sent.
{
  "type": "conversation_history",
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "system",
      "content": "You are a helpful assistant."
    },
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "What is MCP?",
      "timestamp": "2024-05-20T10:00:00Z"
    },
    {
      "role": "assistant",
      "content": "MCP is a Model Context Protocol...",
      "timestamp": "2024-05-20T10:00:05Z"
    }
  ]
}

Example of how conversation history data might be structured when shared via MCP.

By using MCP, AI applications can easily get conversation history or other needed data from an MCP Server, helping the AI understand the flow of interaction.

Using Tools with MCP

MCP defines a standard way for AI applications (Hosts) to use "Tools" made available by MCP Servers. This lets AI do more than just generate text.

How an AI Host Uses a Tool via MCP

Figure 3: Flow of an AI Host using a Tool provided by an MCP Server.

Tool Use Request

  • What it is: An AI Host asks an MCP Server to perform an action using a defined Tool.
  • Includes: Name of the Tool, any needed inputs (parameters).
  • Example: Asking a GitHub MCP Server to fetch a specific file.

Tool Result (Resource)

  • What it is: The data or outcome the MCP Server sends back after the Tool action.
  • Includes: The actual result (e.g., file content), or an error if something went wrong.
  • How it's used: The AI Host uses this result to inform its next steps or response.

This standard way of using Tools means AI applications can interact with many different systems (databases, APIs, file systems) through MCP Servers, greatly increasing what they can do.

05. How MCP Facilitates AI Interactions ⚙️

To use the Model Context Protocol (MCP) well, it helps to know how it enables AI applications (MCP Hosts) to connect with data sources and tools (via MCP Servers). This section looks at the general ways information flows when using MCP.

MCP Information Flow Example

Figure 4: Example flow showing an MCP Host interacting with an MCP Server to get information for an LLM.

Figure 5: General steps in an AI interaction potentially using MCP for data access.

Gathering Information for AI (Host Role)

Before an AI can process a request, the MCP Host (the AI application) gathers relevant information. This often involves getting data (Resources) or using Tools from one or more MCP Servers.

An MCP Host application typically takes steps like these:

  1. Understand Needs: The Host determines what information is needed based on user input or the current task.
  2. Discover/Connect to MCP Servers: The Host identifies and connects to appropriate MCP Servers that can provide the needed data or tools (e.g., a GitHub server for code, a Jira server for project tasks).
  3. Request Resources/Use Tools: The Host asks the MCP Server(s) for specific Resources (data like files or database entries) or requests the use of a Tool (like a search function).
  4. Build Context for LLM: The Host gathers the Resources obtained from Servers, combines them with its own internal information (like chat history), and prepares this combined context for the language model.
  5. Add System Instructions: The Host may add system-level instructions or guidelines for the AI model.
host-data-gathering.js
javascript
// Conceptual example: MCP Host gathers data for its LLM
async function prepareAIContext(userInput, hostInternalState) {
  let contextForLLM = {};
  contextForLLM.userInput = userInput;
  contextForLLM.chatHistory = hostInternalState.getChatHistory(); // From Host's own memory

  // Example: Get a file from a code repository via an MCP Server
  if (userInput.includes("read the main.py file")) {
    // Assume getMCPClientFor returns a pre-configured client for a specific MCP Server
    const codeServerClient = getMCPClientFor('github_mcp_server'); 
    try {
      const fileResource = await codeServerClient.requestResource({ resource_id: '/files/main.py' });
      contextForLLM.retrievedFileContent = fileResource.content;
    } catch (error) {
      contextForLLM.retrievalError = "Could not get file from GitHub MCP Server.";
    }
  }

  // Example: Use a tool from a project management MCP Server
  if (userInput.includes("details for PROJ-123")) {
    const projectServerClient = getMCPClientFor('jira_mcp_server');
    try {
      const taskToolResult = await projectServerClient.useTool({
        tool_name: 'getTaskDetails',
        parameters: { taskId: 'PROJ-123' }
      });
      contextForLLM.taskInfo = taskToolResult.result;
    } catch (error) {
      contextForLLM.toolError = "Could not get task details from Jira MCP Server.";
    }
  }
  
  contextForLLM.systemPrompt = "You are a helpful coding assistant.";
  return contextForLLM;
}

// Placeholder for functions assumed to exist:
// function getMCPClientFor(serverName) { /* ...returns a client object... */ }
// class HostInternalState { getChatHistory() { /* ...returns history... */ } }

Note: The above code is a simplified concept. Actual MCP client libraries (SDKs) will have specific APIs for connecting to servers, discovering available resources/tools, and making requests.

Host Interaction with Language Model

The MCP Host uses the information it has gathered (including from MCP Servers) to work with a language model (LLM) to generate responses or decide on actions.

The Host typically performs these actions:

  1. Send Context to LLM: The Host sends the assembled context (user input, its own memory/chat history, and any Resources/tool outputs from MCP Servers) to an LLM.
  2. Receive LLM Response: The LLM processes the context and returns a response. This response might be text for the user, or it could be a structured request for the Host to use a specific Tool.
  3. Parse LLM Response: The Host examines the LLM's response to understand the next step.
host-llm-tool-use.js
javascript
// Conceptual: Host interacts with LLM and then potentially MCP Servers for tools
async function processWithLLMAndTools(contextForLLM, hostInternalState) {
  // Send context (containing user input, history, and any fetched MCP resources) to LLM
  const llmResponse = await languageModel.generate(contextForLLM);

  hostInternalState.addMessageToHistory('assistant', llmResponse.textOutput);

  // Check if the LLM requested a tool to be used
  if (llmResponse.toolRequests && llmResponse.toolRequests.length > 0) {
    for (const toolRequest of llmResponse.toolRequests) {
      // Example: LLM might request tool 'send_email' from an 'email_mcp_server'
      const targetServerClient = getMCPClientFor(toolRequest.serverName); // e.g., 'email_mcp_server'
      try {
        const toolResult = await targetServerClient.useTool({
          tool_name: toolRequest.toolName, // e.g., 'send_email'
          parameters: toolRequest.parameters // e.g., {to: '...', subject: '...', body: '...'}
        });
        hostInternalState.addMessageToHistory('tool_result', toolResult);
        
        // The Host might send this tool_result back to the LLM for a final summary,
        // or directly inform the user, depending on the application design.
        // For simplicity, we'll just log it here.
        console.log("Tool executed:", toolResult);

      } catch (error) {
        hostInternalState.addMessageToHistory('tool_error', error.message);
        console.error("Error executing tool:", error);
      }
    }
  }
  return llmResponse.textOutput; // Or a more structured response from the Host
}

// Placeholder for assumed functions/objects:
// async function languageModel.generate(context) { /* ...returns {textOutput: '...', toolRequests: []} ... */ }

This shows the Host orchestrating between the LLM and MCP Servers based on the LLM's output.

Host Finalizing Response After Tool Use

After an MCP Server returns the result of a Tool execution, the MCP Host decides what to do next.

Step for HostDescriptionPurpose
Update Internal StateThe Host records the tool result (e.g., in its chat history or other state).Keep a complete record and make the information available for future steps.
Optional: Second LLM CallThe Host might send the tool result back to the LLM to get a more natural, human-readable summary.Generate a final user-facing response that incorporates the tool's output smoothly.
Present to User / ActThe Host presents the final response to the user or takes further action based on the tool result.Complete the user's request or move the interaction forward.

Host-Side Context Management Points

While MCP standardizes how Hosts and Servers communicate, the MCP Host application is responsible for managing its own internal context. This includes:

Managing Local State

  • Conversation History: Storing the back-and-forth messages of an interaction.
  • User Preferences: Remembering user settings or choices.
  • Session Data: Keeping track of information relevant to the current session.

LLM Context Window

  • Size Limits: LLMs have limits on how much context they can process. The Host must select the most relevant information (from its own state and from MCP Servers) to send to the LLM.
  • Relevance Filtering: Deciding which pieces of information are most important for the current step of the conversation.
  • Summarization: Sometimes, long histories or large data pieces might need to be summarized by the Host before sending to the LLM.

Key Takeaway

MCP provides a standard for AI Hosts to get external data and use tools from MCP Servers. The Host application then uses this information, along with its own internal state, to interact with users and LLMs effectively. This separation allows for flexible and powerful AI system designs.

In the next section, we'll look at practical examples of how MCP can be used in different situations.

06. Architecture Diagram ⚙️

The architecture of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) defines how different components interact to manage context in AI applications. Understanding this architecture is essential for implementing MCP effectively and leveraging its capabilities.

High-level MCP Architecture

Figure 2: High-level architecture of the Model Context Protocol, showing how context flows between the user, client application, MCP layer, language model, and external systems.

Key Components

Client Application

The client application is the interface through which users interact with the AI system:

  • Role: Handles user input, displays AI responses, and manages the user interface.
  • Responsibilities: Sending user queries to the MCP layer, receiving and displaying responses, and maintaining the user experience.
  • Examples: Web applications, mobile apps, chatbots, or command-line interfaces.

MCP Layer

The MCP layer is the core of the architecture, responsible for managing context and coordinating interactions between components:

  • Context Manager: Creates, updates, and maintains context objects throughout interactions.
  • Tool Integration: Manages tool definitions, handles tool calls, and processes tool responses.
  • Memory Manager: Maintains conversation history and other forms of memory.
  • Serialization/Deserialization: Converts context objects to and from serialized formats for storage and transmission.

Language Model

The language model is the AI component that generates responses based on the provided context:

  • Role: Processes the context object and generates appropriate responses.
  • Interaction: Receives structured context from the MCP layer and returns responses that can include text, tool calls, or other actions.
  • Examples: Large language models like Claude, GPT-4, or other AI models capable of natural language understanding and generation.

External Systems

External systems extend the capabilities of the AI by providing access to additional information and functionality:

  • Tools: External services or functions that the AI can call to perform specific actions or retrieve information.
  • Knowledge Base: Repositories of information that the AI can access to supplement its knowledge.
  • Memory/History: Storage systems for maintaining conversation history and other persistent information.

Data Flow

The architecture of MCP defines a clear flow of data between components:

  1. User Input: The user interacts with the client application, providing queries or instructions.
  2. Context Creation/Update: The MCP layer creates or updates a context object that includes the user input, conversation history, and other relevant information.
  3. Model Processing: The language model receives the context object and generates a response based on the provided information.
  4. Tool Integration: If the model's response includes tool calls, the MCP layer handles these calls, interacts with the appropriate external systems, and incorporates the results into the context.
  5. Response Delivery: The final response, along with any updated context, is returned to the client application and presented to the user.
  6. Context Persistence: The updated context is stored for future interactions, maintaining continuity in the conversation.

Implementation Considerations

When implementing the MCP architecture, several considerations are important:

  • Scalability: The architecture should be designed to handle increasing amounts of context and growing numbers of users.
  • Performance: Efficient context management is crucial for maintaining responsive AI interactions.
  • Security: Proper security measures should be implemented to protect sensitive information in the context.
  • Extensibility: The implementation should allow for easy addition of new tools and integration with new external systems.
  • Compliance: The architecture should support compliance with relevant regulations regarding data privacy and security.

By understanding the architecture of MCP, developers can implement context management systems that effectively leverage the protocol's capabilities and create more sophisticated, coherent, and capable AI applications.

In the next section, we'll explore the tools and frameworks available for implementing MCP, examining the ecosystem that's emerging around this powerful protocol.

07. Understanding the MCP Ecosystem

For the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to be widely used, an ecosystem of tools and libraries would need to develop. This section discusses the kinds of components that would support developers building or using MCP-enabled systems.

Core Components of an MCP Ecosystem

MCP itself is a specification. A supportive ecosystem would likely include:

  • The MCP Specification: The clear, open definition of the protocol that AI Hosts and MCP Servers follow to communicate.
  • Server-Side Libraries/SDKs: Software development kits (SDKs) or libraries that would help developers easily create MCP Servers. These would simplify tasks like exposing existing APIs as MCP Tools, managing Resource access, and handling requests from AI Hosts.
  • Client-Side (Host) Libraries/SDKs: SDKs or libraries for developers building AI Hosts (the AI applications). These would make it easier for Hosts to find and connect to MCP Servers, call Tools, and get Resources.

Tool Discovery and Registries (Conceptual)

For AI Hosts to use MCP Servers, they need to know what Servers exist and what Tools or Resources they offer. In a mature ecosystem, this might happen through:

  • Direct Configuration: An AI Host might be configured with the addresses of specific MCP Servers it needs to talk to.
  • Discovery Services / Registries: A central (or distributed) registry where developers of MCP Servers can list their services and the tools they offer. AI Hosts could then query this registry to find relevant Servers.

Development and Testing Support (Conceptual)

To help developers build reliable MCP-based systems:

  • For MCP Server Developers: Tools to help validate that their server correctly follows the MCP specification. Mock AI Host tools could simulate requests to test server responses and tool logic.
  • For AI Host Developers: Mock MCP Server tools would be very useful. These could simulate different Servers and tool responses, allowing developers to test their AI Host's logic for calling tools and handling context without needing live backend systems.

Conceptual Ecosystem Diagram

MCP Host-Server Interaction

Figure 4: Conceptual diagram of an AI Host using an MCP client library to interact with an MCP Server, which in turn uses a server library to expose a backend system.

Conceptual Code Examples

Below are simplified, conceptual examples of how defining and using a tool might look from the perspective of an MCP Server and an MCP Host.

1. MCP Server: Defining a Tool (Conceptual)

An MCP Server (e.g., for a weather service) would define the schema for a tool it offers. The actual implementation of how it gets the weather data would be internal to this server.

// On the Weather MCP Server: Tool Schema Definition
{
  "tool_name": "get_current_weather",
  "description": "Get the current weather for a specific location.",
  "parameters_schema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "location": { "type": "string", "description": "The city and state, e.g., San Francisco, CA" },
      "unit": { "type": "string", "enum": ["celsius", "fahrenheit"], "default": "celsius" }
    },
    "required": ["location"]
  },
  "response_schema": {
    "type": "object",
    "properties": {
      "temperature": { "type": "integer" },
      "unit": { "type": "string" },
      "condition": { "type": "string" }
    }
  }
}
// Note: The server also implements the logic to fulfill this tool request
// using its actual weather data source when a Host calls it.

2. AI Host: Calling the Tool via MCP (Conceptual)

An AI Host (e.g., a chatbot) that wants to get weather information would use an MCP client library to call the 'get_current_weather' tool on the Weather MCP Server.

// In the AI Host application (e.g., using a hypothetical MCP client library)
async function fetchWeatherForUser(location) {
  const weatherServerAddress = "https://weather.mcp-server.example.com"; // Address of the Weather MCP Server
  const toolName = "get_current_weather";
  const parameters = { location: location, unit: "celsius" };

  try {
    // Hypothetical mcpClient.callTool(server, toolName, params)
    const result = await mcpClient.callTool(weatherServerAddress, toolName, parameters);
    
    // result would be a Resource containing data matching the tool's response_schema
    // e.g., { temperature: 18, unit: "celsius", condition: "Cloudy" }
    console.log("The weather in " + location + " is " + result.temperature + "°" + result.unit + " and " + result.condition + ".");
    return result; 
  } catch (error) {
    console.error("Error calling weather tool:", error);
    // Handle error appropriately
    return null;
  }
}

// Example usage in the Host:
// const weatherData = await fetchWeatherForUser("London, UK");

Getting Started with MCP Ideas

If you are thinking about working with MCP, whether building an AI Host or offering an MCP Server:

  1. Understand the MCP Specification: Get familiar with the core concepts of the protocol, including how Hosts, Servers, Tools, and Resources interact.
  2. For AI Host Developers: Think about how your AI application could benefit from accessing external data or capabilities. Identify what kinds of MCP Servers you would ideally want to connect to.
  3. For System/API Providers (Potential MCP Server Developers): Consider if your existing systems or APIs could be valuable to AI applications if exposed via MCP. Think about what Tools or Resources you could offer.
  4. Look for (or help create) SDKs: Check for existing client or server libraries for your programming language that support MCP. If they don't exist, and you are able, contributing to open-source efforts can help the ecosystem grow.
  5. Start Simple: Whether designing a Host or Server, begin with a small set of tools or resources and expand from there.

Future Possibilities

A growing MCP ecosystem could lead to:

  • Richer AI Applications: AI Hosts that can easily and safely access a wide variety of specialized tools and data from many different MCP Servers.
  • Easier Integration: Standardized ways for businesses to make their systems AI-accessible through MCP Servers.
  • More Innovation: Clear separation between AI Host development and data/tool provisioning (MCP Servers) could allow faster progress in both areas.
  • Improved Security and Control: The protocol can evolve to include strong security, consent, and data governance features for interactions between Hosts and Servers.

The development of supporting tools and real-world use will be key to MCP's success.

08. MCP in Action: A Customer Support Example

To show how MCP can be used, let's look at an example: an AI system for customer support that helps people with their online orders.

The Customer Support Setup

Imagine an online store has an AI assistant to help customers. This AI assistant is an MCP Host. To answer questions, it needs to get information from several of the store's systems. It does this by connecting to different MCP Servers, each providing access to a specific system:

  • An Order System MCP Server (to check order status, process returns).
  • An Inventory System MCP Server (to check product stock).
  • A Customer Info MCP Server (to get customer details, update info).
  • A Shipping Service MCP Server (to track packages, connected to carriers like UPS/FedEx).

How MCP Helps Build This System

Here's how such a customer support system could use MCP:

1. MCP Servers Define and Offer Tools

Developers for each business system (like order management or inventory) create an MCP Server. Each server defines "Tools" that the AI assistant (MCP Host) can discover and use. For example, the Order System's MCP Server would offer a tool to get order details. The definition explains what the tool does, what information it needs (parameters), and what kind of answer it gives. MCP Servers also implement the logic to execute these tools by interacting with their underlying backend systems.

// Example: Simplified Tool Definitions on the respective MCP Servers

// ---- On the Order System MCP Server ----
const getOrderDetailsTool = {
  name: "get_order_details",
  description: "Get details for a customer's order using the order ID.",
  parameters_schema: {
    type: "object",
    properties: {
      order_id: { type: "string", description: "The ID of the order." }
    },
    required: ["order_id"]
  },
  // response_schema would also be defined by the server
  // Server-side handler (conceptual):
  // async function executeGetOrderDetails(params) { 
  //   return await actualOrderSystemAPI.fetchOrder(params.order_id);
  // }
};

const processReturnTool = {
  name: "process_return",
  description: "Initiate a return process for an order items.",
  parameters_schema: { /* ... schema for order_id, items, reason ... */ },
  // Server-side handler (conceptual):
  // async function executeProcessReturn(params) { /* ... */ }
};

// ---- On the Shipping Service MCP Server ----
const trackShipmentTool = {
  name: "track_shipment",
  description: "Track a shipment using a tracking number.",
  parameters_schema: {
    type: "object",
    properties: {
      tracking_number: { type: "string", description: "The shipment tracking number." },
      carrier: { type: "string", description: "Optional: carrier name (e.g., UPS, FedEx)" }
    },
    required: ["tracking_number"]
  },
  // Server-side handler (conceptual):
  // async function executeTrackShipment(params) { /* ... */ }
};

// ---- On the Inventory System MCP Server ----
const checkInventoryTool = {
  name: "check_inventory",
  description: "Check stock levels for a product ID.",
  parameters_schema: { /* ... schema for product_id ... */ },
  // Server-side handler (conceptual):
  // async function executeCheckInventory(params) { /* ... */ }
};

Note: This shows simplified tool definitions. MCP Servers expose these definitions and handle their execution, connecting to the actual business systems.

2. AI Assistant (MCP Host) Prepares for Interaction

When a customer starts chatting, the AI assistant (MCP Host) gets ready. It has information (perhaps from a discovery service or configuration) about available MCP Servers and the Tools they offer. It prepares an initial prompt for its language model (LLM), including instructions on how to behave and general knowledge about how to request the use of available tools when needed.

// Conceptual: AI Host (Customer Support AI) sets up for a new session
function setupAIHostForSupportSession(customerInfo) {
  const systemMessageContent = `You are a customer support AI for SuperShop.
Available actions you can request (and the server that provides them):
- get_order_details (OrderServer): to get order details.
- track_shipment (ShippingServer): to track shipments.
- process_return (OrderServer): to start a return.
- check_inventory (InventoryServer): to check product stock.
Be polite. Verify customer identity for sensitive actions. If you need to use a tool, state the tool name and parameters clearly.`;

  const initialLLMPrompt = [
    { "role": "system", "content": systemMessageContent },
    // Optionally, add user greeting or known context if available
    // { "role": "user", "content": "Hello!" } 
  ];
  
  // The Host knows how to make calls to MCP Servers using a client library.
  // It doesn't implement the tools themselves.
  return { "promptForLLM": initialLLMPrompt };
}

3. Customer Interaction and Initial LLM Processing

The customer sends a message. The AI Host adds this to the conversation history and sends the history to its LLM.

// Customer message
const customerMessage = "Hi, I ordered a laptop last week (order #ABC123) but haven't received any shipping updates. Can you help me check on its status?";

// AI Host adds to its history and sends to LLM (simplified)
// hostState.conversationHistory.add("user", customerMessage);
// const llmContext = buildContextForLLM(hostState.conversationHistory, knownToolsInfo);
// const llmResponse = await internalLLM.generate(llmContext);

The LLM processes the input. Based on its instructions and the query, it might decide a tool is needed. The LLM's response would indicate this intended tool call in a structured way.

// Example structured response from the Host's LLM, indicating a tool call
{
  "assistant_response_text": "Okay, I can help you with that. Let me check your order #ABC123.",
  "tool_calls": [
    {
      "tool_name": "get_order_details",
      "parameters": {
        "order_id": "ABC123"
      },
      "target_mcp_server": "OrderServer" // Info for the Host
    }
  ]
}

4. Host Executes Tool via MCP Server

The AI Host receives the LLM's response. It sees the `tool_calls` request. The Host then uses its MCP client library to contact the specified MCP Server (e.g., "OrderServer") and request the execution of the `get_order_details` tool with the given parameters.

// Conceptual: AI Host makes the actual tool call to the Order System MCP Server
// const mcpOrderServerClient = getMCPClientFor("OrderServer");
// const orderDetailsResult = await mcpOrderServerClient.useTool({
//   tool_name: "get_order_details", 
//   parameters: { order_id: "ABC123" }
// });

// Example result from the Order System MCP Server (now in the Host)
const orderDetailsResult = {
  // This is the Resource returned by the Server
  data: {
    order_id: "ABC123",
    status: "processing",
    items: [{ name: "UltraBook Pro 16", quantity: 1, status: "backordered" }],
    shipping_tracking_number: null // Example: No tracking yet
  },
  error: null
};

5. Host Processes Tool Result and Continues with LLM

The Host receives the `orderDetailsResult` from the MCP Server. It adds this new information to its conversation history (or a temporary context for the LLM) and sends it back to the LLM to decide the next step or formulate a response to the user. The LLM might see the item is "backordered" and decide to check inventory.

// Host sends tool result back to its LLM.
// LLM processes and might respond with another tool call:
{
  "assistant_response_text": "I see your order for the UltraBook Pro 16 is processing, but the item is currently backordered. Let me check when it might be back in stock.",
  "tool_calls": [
    {
      "tool_name": "check_inventory",
      "parameters": {
        "product_id": "UB-PRO-16" // Assuming Host/LLM can infer this ID
      },
      "target_mcp_server": "InventoryServer"
    }
  ]
}

The Host would then call the `check_inventory` tool on the `InventoryServer` via MCP, get the result, and so on.

6. Final AI Response to Customer

After potentially multiple interactions with its LLM and various MCP Servers, the Host's LLM can formulate a complete answer. The Host then delivers this to the customer.

// Example final response from Host (based on LLM generation after all tool calls)
"I've checked your order #ABC123 for the UltraBook Pro 16. The order is currently processing. The laptop is backordered, but our inventory system shows it's expected back in stock by November 25th. Once it ships, you'll get a tracking number. I apologize for the delay!"

MCP Workflow Diagram (Corrected)

Customer Support AI (Host) using MCP Servers

Figure 6: Sequence diagram showing the AI Host orchestrating with its LLM and various MCP Servers.

Key Benefits Demonstrated

This example shows several key benefits of an AI Host using MCP Servers:

  • Standardized System Access: MCP provides a common way for the AI Host to request data and actions from different backend systems (orders, inventory) via their respective MCP Servers.
  • Host-Orchestrated Context: The AI Host manages the overall conversation and decides when to call its LLM and when to call MCP Servers. It combines information from all sources to build context.
  • Clear Tool Use: MCP Servers define tools clearly. The AI Host requests their use, and the Servers handle the actual execution against backend systems.
  • Separation of Concerns: The AI Host focuses on user interaction and LLM communication. MCP Servers focus on exposing their specific system's data and capabilities in a standard way.
  • Complex Workflows: The AI Host can use its LLM to reason through multiple steps, calling different tools on different MCP Servers as needed to solve a user's problem.

Extending the System

This MCP-based customer support system could be extended:

  • More MCP Servers: Add an MCP Server for shipping to track packages, or a User Profile MCP Server for personalization.
  • Authentication: An Authentication MCP Server could provide a tool for verifying customer identity before the Host requests sensitive actions via other MCP Servers.
  • Proactive Notifications: The Host could use a tool from an MCP Server to trigger notifications (e.g., email dispatch update).

This example shows how an AI Host using MCP allows for building powerful and flexible AI applications that can connect to and use many different backend systems through a standard protocol.

Introducing the Agent2Agent (A2A) Protocol

Alongside protocols like MCP that help AI agents access tools and data, another key challenge is enabling different AI agents to communicate and work together effectively. Google, along with numerous technology partners, has introduced the Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol to address this.

"A2A is an open protocol that complements Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP), which provides helpful tools and context to agents... A2A empowers developers to build agents capable of connecting with any other agent built using the protocol and offers users the flexibility to combine agents from various providers."

What is A2A For?

As businesses build more AI agents for tasks like customer service, data analysis, or internal process automation, these agents often need to collaborate. For example, an agent helping with sales might need to coordinate with an inventory agent and a shipping agent. A2A aims to provide a standard way for such collaborations to happen, even if the agents are built by different companies or use different underlying technologies.

Key goals of A2A include:

  • Enabling Multi-Agent Ecosystems: Allowing diverse AI agents to work together in a dynamic way.
  • Secure Information Exchange: Providing a safe way for agents to share data and instructions.
  • Coordinated Actions: Helping agents to work in concert to achieve complex tasks that span multiple systems or domains.
  • Increased Autonomy and Productivity: By allowing agents to collaborate, A2A aims to boost their ability to handle tasks independently and improve overall efficiency.
  • Vendor and Framework Neutrality: Promoting interoperability regardless of how or by whom an agent was built.

A Collaborative Effort

The A2A protocol was launched with contributions and support from a wide range of technology companies and service providers. This broad collaboration highlights a shared interest in creating a future where AI agents can seamlessly work together to automate complex workflows.

(Partners mentioned in the announcement include Atlassian, Box, Cohere, Intuit, Langchain, MongoDB, PayPal, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow, and many others.)

In the next section, we'll explore the core concepts and design principles behind the A2A protocol.

Why A2A Matters: The Future of Agent Collaboration

The Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol, announced by Google, represents a significant step towards a future where AI agents can collaborate seamlessly and effectively. While still in its nascent stages with a projected launch for its first version (1.0-alpha) in April 2025, its proposal addresses critical needs in the rapidly evolving AI landscape.

Overcoming Fragmentation

Currently, the AI agent ecosystem is highly fragmented. Numerous companies and developers are building agents, but they often operate in silos, unable to communicate or cooperate with agents from different providers or platforms. This limits their overall utility and creates a disjointed user experience.

A2A aims to break down these silos by establishing an open standard for inter-agent communication. Much like how protocols like HTTP and SMTP enabled the internet and email to flourish by ensuring interoperability, A2A could pave the way for a true web of interconnected AI agents.

Enhancing Agent Capabilities

No single agent can be an expert in everything. A2A allows for the development of specialized agents that excel at specific tasks (e.g., scheduling, data analysis, content creation, e-commerce). These specialized agents can then collaborate, combining their unique strengths to tackle complex problems that would be beyond the reach of any individual agent.

For users, this means access to more powerful and versatile AI assistance. For developers, it means they can focus on building best-in-class agents in their domain of expertise, knowing they can leverage other A2A-compatible agents for complementary functionalities.

Fostering Innovation and an Open Ecosystem

By proposing A2A as an open protocol, Google is encouraging broad adoption and community-driven development. An open standard fosters innovation by allowing anyone to build compatible agents and services. This can lead to a vibrant ecosystem of tools, platforms, and specialized agents, much like the open-source software movement has accelerated technological progress in other areas.

An open approach also promotes transparency and can help address concerns around vendor lock-in, giving users and developers more choice and control.

User-Centric Design and Control

A key design principle of A2A is to keep the user in control. The protocol includes mechanisms for capability discovery, task management, and UX negotiation, ensuring that users can understand and manage how agents are collaborating on their behalf. This is crucial for building trust and ensuring that AI agent interactions align with user intent and preferences.

Complementing Other Protocols like MCP

It's important to note that A2A is not designed to replace all other AI-related protocols. For instance, the Model Context Protocol (MCP) focuses on standardizing how AI models (often the 'brains' of an agent) access external data and tools through a Host-Server architecture. A2A, on the other hand, focuses on how independent agents (which may internally use MCP or similar mechanisms) communicate and collaborate with each other.

In this sense, protocols like MCP and A2A can be complementary. An agent built using MCP to interact with its tools and data sources could then use A2A to collaborate with other agents, creating a richer, more capable AI ecosystem.

Paving the Way for Sophisticated AI Applications

Ultimately, A2A matters because it is a foundational piece of infrastructure for the next generation of AI applications. From highly personalized assistants that can manage various aspects of our digital lives to complex, multi-agent systems that can solve scientific or business challenges, A2A provides a crucial framework for enabling these advancements.

While its full impact will unfold over time, the vision behind A2A – a world of interoperable, collaborative AI agents – is a compelling one, promising a more integrated and intelligent digital future.

Core Ideas of the A2A Protocol

The Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol is built on several key ideas and a specific interaction model. These are designed to make agent collaboration flexible, secure, and widely adoptable, drawing from Google's experience with large-scale agent systems.

A2A Design Principles

According to the Google Developers Blog, A2A was designed with five main principles:

1. Embrace Agentic Capabilities

A2A focuses on enabling agents to collaborate in their natural, often unstructured ways, even if they don't share memory, tools, or context directly. It aims for true multi-agent scenarios without reducing agents to just being 'tools' for other agents.

2. Build on Existing Standards

The protocol uses well-known standards like HTTP, Server-Sent Events (SSE), and JSON-RPC. This makes it easier to integrate with existing IT systems businesses already use.

3. Secure by Default

A2A is designed to support strong security for businesses, including authentication and authorization, with features comparable to OpenAPI's security schemes.

4. Support for Long-Running Tasks

A2A is flexible and can handle quick tasks as well as complex research that might take hours or days, especially when humans are involved. It can provide real-time feedback, notifications, and status updates.

5. Modality Agnostic

Recognizing that agent interactions go beyond text, A2A is designed to support different types of data and communication, including audio and video streaming.

How A2A Works: Key Interaction Features

A2A defines interactions between a "client" agent and a "remote" agent. The client agent gives tasks, and the remote agent works to complete them. This involves several key features:

Simplified flow of an A2A interaction.

  • 1. Capability Discovery

    Agents can advertise what they can do using an "Agent Card" in JSON format. This allows a client agent to find the best remote agent for a particular task and then use A2A to communicate with it.

  • 2. Task Management

    Communication is focused on completing tasks. A "task" object, defined by the protocol, has a lifecycle. It can be finished quickly, or for long-running tasks, agents can communicate to stay synchronized on the latest status. The output of a task is called an "artifact."

  • 3. Collaboration

    Agents can send messages to each other to share context, replies, artifacts (like generated reports or images), or instructions from users.

  • 4. User Experience (UX) Negotiation

    Each message in A2A can contain "parts," which are fully formed pieces of content (like a generated image or a web form). Each part has a specific content type. This allows client and remote agents to discuss and agree on the correct format needed by the user and to explicitly negotiate the user's UI capabilities (e.g., can the user's interface display iframes, video, interactive forms, etc.?).

For full technical details, developers can refer to the A2A draft specification often linked from the official Google communications on A2A.

Next, we'll see a practical example of how A2A could be used in a real-world scenario.

Visualizing A2A: Agent Collaboration Flow

Diagram: Conceptual flow of a client agent using A2A to collaborate with remote specialized agents.

These core concepts provide a foundation for building a flexible and powerful multi-agent ecosystem. By standardizing these fundamental aspects of agent interaction, A2A aims to unlock new levels of automation and AI-driven assistance.

The A2A Ecosystem: Envisioning Tools and Frameworks

The Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol, with its first version anticipated in April 2025, is designed as an open standard to foster a rich ecosystem. While specific tools and frameworks will emerge post-launch and through community efforts, we can envision the types of development support that would be crucial for A2A's success and widespread adoption.

Core Components of an A2A Ecosystem

A thriving A2A ecosystem would likely include:

  • A2A Client Libraries: For various programming languages (e.g., Python, JavaScript, Java, Go) to simplify agent development. These libraries would handle the low-level details of A2A message construction, parsing, sending, and receiving, allowing developers to focus on agent logic and capabilities.
  • Agent Development Frameworks (ADFs): Higher-level frameworks built on top of client libraries, providing templates, common patterns, and abstractions for building A2A-compatible agents. These might include features for managing agent state, lifecycle, identity, and service discovery.
  • Discovery and Registration Services: Mechanisms for agents to announce their presence, capabilities, and how to interact with them. This could involve decentralized registries or standardized discovery protocols that A2A agents can use to find each other.
  • Testing and Simulation Tools: Tools for testing individual agents and simulating interactions between multiple agents in a controlled environment. This would be vital for debugging, ensuring protocol compliance, and evaluating the behavior of collaborative agent systems.
  • Monitoring and Analytics Platforms: Services to monitor A2A message flows, agent performance, and overall health of multi-agent applications. This helps in identifying bottlenecks, errors, and understanding complex interactions.
  • Security and Trust Infrastructure: Tools and protocols for agent authentication, authorization, secure communication channels, and potentially reputation systems to ensure trustworthy interactions within the A2A network.
  • UX Integration Kits: Guidelines, components, and SDKs to help developers integrate A2A agent interactions smoothly into user-facing applications, supporting A2A's emphasis on UX negotiation and user control.

Conceptual: Agent Registration and Discovery

Imagine a global or domain-specific "Agent Directory Service" where agents can register their capabilities. An agent needing a specific service could query this directory.

Diagram: Conceptual flow of A2A agent registration and discovery.

Example: A2A Client Library Usage (Conceptual)

A developer building a "Task Management Agent" might use a hypothetical A2A Python library as follows:

python
# Conceptual Python code using a hypothetical a2a_library

from a2a_library import A2AClient, Message, Task
import asyncio

# Initialize the A2A client for our Task Management Agent
task_agent = A2AClient(agent_id="task_manager_agent_v1.2", api_key="YOUR_API_KEY", environment="production")

async def assign_task_to_colleague_agent(task_description, colleague_agent_id):
    print(f"Attempting to assign task: '{task_description}' to {colleague_agent_id}")

    # 1. Discover colleague agent
    colleague_agent_endpoint = await task_agent.discover(colleague_agent_id)
    if not colleague_agent_endpoint:
        print(f"Could not discover {colleague_agent_id}")
        return None

    # 2. Create an A2A task message
    # (Following A2A standard for task assignment)
    new_task = Task(
        task_id="task_uuid_12345",
        action="create_and_assign_task",
        payload={
            "description": task_description,
            "assignee_hint": "user_john_doe",
            "due_date": "2025-06-15",
            "priority": "medium",
            "estimated_effort": "2h"
        }
    )
    
    a2a_message = Message(
        sender_agent_id=task_agent.agent_id,
        receiver_agent_id=colleague_agent_id,
        target_endpoint=colleague_agent_endpoint,  # Target address for the message
        task=new_task,
        message_id="msg_" + new_task.task_id,
        timestamp=asyncio.get_event_loop().time()
    )

    # 3. Send the message and await response
    try:
        response_message = await task_agent.send_and_receive(a2a_message, timeout=30)
        if response_message and response_message.payload.get("status") == "accepted":
            print(f"Task successfully assigned to {colleague_agent_id}")
            return response_message.payload
        else:
            print(f"Task assignment failed or was rejected by {colleague_agent_id}")
            return None
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"Error sending A2A message: {e}")
        return None

# Example usage
async def main():
    result = await assign_task_to_colleague_agent(
        "Finalize Q2 report and send to stakeholders", 
        "reporting_assistant_agent_v1"
    )
    print(f"Assignment result: {result}")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    asyncio.run(main())

# This implementation follows the conceptual A2A specification.
# Real-world A2A libraries would provide more detailed mechanisms for 
# discovery, security (authentication/authorization), message handling, 
# payload standardization, and error management based on the A2A spec.

Getting Started and Future Developments

With the A2A protocol's first version targeted for April 2025, the initial phase will likely focus on releasing the specification itself, followed by reference implementations or early-stage client libraries from Google and other pioneering organizations.

"Getting started" will initially mean studying the protocol specification once available. As the ecosystem matures, developers can expect to find more sophisticated tools and frameworks to accelerate A2A-compatible agent development. The open nature of A2A should encourage community contributions, leading to a diverse set of resources over time.

The evolution of this ecosystem will be critical. Just as MCP benefits from clear definitions for Hosts and Servers, A2A will thrive if robust tools emerge for building, discovering, and managing collaborative agents.

A2A in Action: A Candidate Sourcing Example

To understand how the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol might function in a real-world scenario, let's consider an example inspired by the use cases Google envisions: automated candidate sourcing and interview scheduling. Imagine a company looking to hire a software engineer. This process often involves multiple steps and coordination, perfect for showcasing A2A's collaborative potential.

The Scenario: Hiring a Software Engineer

A hiring manager needs to find and schedule interviews with qualified software engineering candidates. Two primary agents could be involved:

  • Recruiting Agent (RA): This agent specializes in finding and vetting candidates. It can access job boards, professional networks, and internal HR databases.
  • Scheduling Agent (SA): This agent manages the hiring manager's calendar and can coordinate interview times with candidates.

The goal is to automate the process from identifying potential candidates to getting initial interviews scheduled.

How A2A Facilitates Collaboration

Here's a simplified flow of how these agents might use A2A:

  1. Task Initiation: The hiring manager (or an overarching "Hiring Process Agent") tasks the Recruiting Agent with finding suitable candidates for a "Senior Software Engineer" role with specific skill requirements. This request is formulated according to A2A standards.
  2. Capability Discovery & Task Decomposition: The RA understands its primary task. It might determine that, after identifying a qualified candidate, scheduling an interview is a necessary sub-task. Using A2A's discovery mechanisms, the RA finds the Scheduling Agent and confirms its capability to schedule interviews.
  3. Candidate Identification (RA's primary role): The RA searches various sources, identifies a promising candidate, and perhaps even conducts an initial automated screening (e.g., resume parsing, basic skill check).
  4. Inter-Agent Task Handoff/Request: Once a qualified candidate expresses interest, the RA needs to schedule an interview. It sends a standardized A2A message to the SA. This message would include necessary details like the candidate's availability (if known, or a request for the SA to obtain it), the interviewer's details, and the desired interview duration.
  5. Scheduling (SA's primary role): The SA receives the request. It checks the hiring manager's calendar for open slots. It might then interact with the candidate (or their agent, if the candidate also uses an A2A-compatible agent) to find a mutually agreeable time. This interaction would also use A2A messages.
  6. Confirmation and Notification: Once a time is confirmed, the SA updates the hiring manager's calendar and sends A2A confirmation messages back to the RA and potentially directly to the candidate (or their agent). The RA might then update its records for the hiring process.
  7. User Experience (UX) Negotiation: Throughout this process, A2A's UX negotiation capabilities could be used. For instance, if the SA cannot find a slot that matches the RA's initial constraints, it could propose alternative times. The RA, or even the hiring manager via their interface to the RA, could then accept or reject these proposals.

Illustrative A2A Interaction Flow

Diagram: Simplified A2A interaction for candidate sourcing and scheduling.

Conceptual A2A Message Snippet

While A2A is a protocol specification and not a specific API, a message from the Recruiting Agent to the Scheduling Agent might conceptually look like this (e.g., in a JSON-like format):

json
{
  "protocol_version": "A2A/1.0-alpha",
  "message_id": "msg_78910",
  "sender_agent_id": "recruiting_agent_v1",
  "receiver_agent_id": "scheduling_agent_v2",
  "task_id": "task_abc123_interview_candidate_jane_doe",
  "action": "request_schedule_interview",
  "payload": {
    "candidate_info": {
      "name": "Jane Doe",
      "contact": "jane.doe@example.com",
      "role_applied_for": "Senior Software Engineer"
    },
    "interviewer_info": {
      "name": "John Smith",
      "id": "john.smith@example.com"
    },
    "interview_details": {
      "duration_minutes": 60,
      "type": "initial_screening"
    },
    "preferred_windows": [
      { "start_time": "2025-05-10T14:00:00Z", "end_time": "2025-05-10T17:00:00Z" },
      { "start_time": "2025-05-11T10:00:00Z", "end_time": "2025-05-11T12:00:00Z" }
    ],
    "required_capabilities_for_confirmation": ["calendar_write", "email_notification"]
  },
  "timestamp": "2025-04-20T10:30:00Z"
}

This conceptual example highlights key elements: sender/receiver, a specific task, the action requested (scheduling), and a payload with all necessary data. The A2A protocol would define the structure and semantics for such messages, ensuring different agents can understand and act upon them.

This scenario demonstrates how A2A aims to enable specialized agents to collaborate effectively, automating complex workflows by standardizing their communication and interaction patterns.

Comparing MCP and A2A: Two Protocols for a Smarter AI Future

The AI landscape is rapidly evolving, and with it, the need for clear standards to help different systems work together. Two important protocols emerging in this space are the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol. While both aim to improve AI capabilities, they address different aspects of the ecosystem. Understanding their distinctions and potential synergies is key for developers building next-generation AI applications.

Model Context Protocol (MCP)

MCP focuses on standardizing how an AI application (the "Host") accesses external data and capabilities (called "Resources"). It defines a client-server architecture where "Servers" expose these Resources in a predictable way, allowing the Host to easily discover and use them. Think of it as a universal adapter for AI models to plug into various data sources and tools.

Diagram: MCP enables an AI Host to connect with various Servers to access data and tools.

Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol

A2A, announced by Google (with v1.0-alpha expected April 2025), is designed to enable independent AI agents to communicate and collaborate with each other. It aims to create an open standard for inter-agent messaging, capability discovery, task management, and even UX negotiation. This allows specialized agents from different developers or organizations to work together on complex tasks.

Diagram: A2A facilitates communication and collaboration between different AI agents.

Key Differences and Similarities

FeatureModel Context Protocol (MCP)Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol
Primary GoalStandardize how an AI application (Host) consumes data and tools (Resources) from external systems (Servers).Enable independent AI agents to communicate, discover capabilities, and collaborate on tasks.
Architectural FocusClient-Server (Host-Server): An AI app connecting to data/tool providers.Peer-to-Peer/Networked: Multiple agents interacting within a collaborative framework.
Scope of InteractionBetween an AI model/application and its direct sources of context or tools.Between distinct AI agents, which may come from different developers or organizations.
Key AbstractionsHost, Server, Resource, Resource Schema.Agent Identity, Capability Discovery, Task Protocols, Message Formats, UX Negotiation.
Problem SolvedReduces bespoke integrations for AI to access data/tools; promotes reusability of context sources.Overcomes agent silos; enables complex workflows through multi-agent collaboration.
Typical Use CasesAI assistant accessing user files, a language model using a calculator tool, an app fetching data from a specific database via an MCP Server.A travel planning agent coordinating with flight booking and hotel reservation agents; a research agent delegating data collection to multiple specialized agents.
StatusSpecification available (modelcontextprotocol.io); ecosystem developing.Announced by Google; v1.0-alpha targeted for April 2025. Open protocol.

Complementary, Not Competitive

MCP and A2A are not mutually exclusive; they operate at different levels of the AI stack and can be highly complementary:

  • An individual AI agent, built to collaborate with other agents using A2A, might internally use MCP to connect to its own specialized tools, databases, or file systems.
  • MCP standardizes the "last mile" connection for an agent to get its necessary context or execute a tool. A2A standardizes how that agent then talks to other agents.

Visualizing the Synergy

Diagram: A2A can manage collaboration between agents, while each agent might use MCP internally to access its tools and data.

When to Consider Each

  • Focus on MCP if: You are building an AI application or a large language model (LLM) integration that needs to reliably connect to diverse, potentially pre-existing data sources or tools. Your primary concern is standardizing how your AI gets its operational context.
  • Focus on A2A if: You are developing multiple AI agents that need to work together, or you want your agent to interoperate within a broader ecosystem of third-party agents. Your primary concern is enabling agent-to-agent communication, discovery, and collaborative task execution.
  • Consider Both if: You are designing complex AI systems where individual components (agents) need both to access their own resources efficiently (MCP) and to coordinate effectively with other components (A2A).

Both MCP and A2A are vital for building a more mature, interconnected, and capable AI future. As they develop and gain adoption, they will likely unlock new possibilities for sophisticated AI solutions.

10. What's Next for Context and Agent Protocols 🔮

As AI capabilities advance, protocols for managing context and enabling agent interactions, like the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol, will become increasingly crucial for building sophisticated AI systems. This section explores emerging ideas and future directions for such protocols, highlighting how they might evolve and shape the AI landscape.

Future Directions for Interaction Protocols

Figure 7: Future directions for how context and agent communication protocols might develop.

Several key developments are shaping the evolution of protocols like MCP and A2A:

Interoperability and Standardization

As more organizations adopt various context and agent communication protocols, ensuring seamless interoperability through common standards is becoming a major focus. This allows different AI systems, potentially using different underlying protocols, to still exchange information and collaborate effectively.

Cross-Protocol Harmony

Efforts to ensure systems using different protocols (e.g., an MCP-Host and an A2A-Agent) can interact or exchange data where appropriate, possibly through gateways or common data formats.

Shared Industry Specifications

Development of overarching specifications or guidelines that different protocols can align with, similar to web standards (HTTP) or real-time communication standards (WebSockets).

Open Implementations

Growth of open-source tools and software for various protocols, promoting wider adoption and giving users more choices and flexibility.

These efforts will enable organizations to leverage different protocols like MCP and A2A more effectively, integrating them into existing systems and accelerating innovation in AI applications.

More Sophisticated Context and Task Management

Future protocols will likely offer more advanced ways to manage context and coordinate tasks as AI interactions and agent collaborations become more complex. MCP focuses on structured context via Resources, while A2A emphasizes task delegation and capability discovery between agents.

FeatureDescriptionBenefit
Structured & Dynamic ContextMethods for organizing context in layers or structured formats (as in MCP Resources) and dynamically updating it based on interaction flow or task status (relevant to both MCP and A2A).Improves AI's ability to understand, organize, and utilize information effectively.
Context Summarization & PruningTechniques to automatically summarize or prune context to fit operational constraints while preserving key information.Enables longer or more complex interactions without losing critical details.
Intelligent Context & Capability RetrievalAdvanced methods for retrieving the most relevant context or discovering appropriate agent capabilities for a given task or query.Enhances relevance of responses and actions, reducing unnecessary information or steps.
Contextual & Task HistoryMechanisms for tracking changes in context and task states, potentially allowing rollback or review of previous states.Supports robust context and task management in complex, multi-step AI systems and collaborations.

These advancements will support more nuanced and effective management of information and actions in sophisticated AI interactions, addressing key challenges in current AI systems.

Richer Tool and Capability Integration

The ways AI systems integrate with tools (as in MCP) and leverage external agent capabilities (as in A2A) are expected to become significantly more advanced, expanding AI's functional reach.

Dynamic Tool/Capability Discovery

AI systems could dynamically discover available tools from MCP Servers or capabilities from A2A Agents, adapting to new functionalities or changes in the ecosystem. For example, an MCP Host might query a registry for relevant Servers, or an A2A Client Agent might discover Remote Agents with specific skills.

// Conceptual: Future MCP Host finding tools
async function discoverToolsAndCapabilities(appContext) {
  // For MCP: Host might ask a central registry or known MCP Servers
  const newMCPServers = await appContext.mcpClient.discoverServers({
    tool_categories: ["data_analysis", "communication"]
  });
  appContext.registerMCPServers(newMCPServers);

  // For A2A: Client Agent discovers Remote Agents
  const newA2AAgents = await appContext.a2aClient.discoverAgents({
    capabilities: ["image_generation", "language_translation"]
  });
  appContext.registerA2AAgents(newA2AAgents);
}
Orchestrated Tool/Capability Chaining

Future systems might allow AI applications to orchestrate sequences of tool calls (via MCP) or delegated tasks (via A2A) across multiple Servers or Agents to accomplish complex objectives. The application would manage the flow and data handoffs.

// Conceptual: Application orchestrating MCP and A2A calls
async function complexWorkflow(appContext, initialInput) {
  // 1. Use an MCP tool for initial data processing
  const processedData = await appContext.mcpClient.useTool(
    "DataProcessingServer", "cleanDataTool", { raw_data: initialInput }
  );
  // 2. Delegate a specialized task to an A2A Agent
  const analysisResult = await appContext.a2aClient.delegateTask(
    "AnalyticsAgentPrime", "performAdvancedAnalysis", { data: processedData.data }
  );
  // 3. Use another MCP tool for final reporting
  const report = await appContext.mcpClient.useTool(
    "ReportingServer", "generateReport", { analysis: analysisResult.outbound_data.analysis }
  );
  return report.data;
}

Multimodal Interactions

Future protocols will increasingly need to support multimodal data (text, images, audio, video, etc.). MCP Servers could offer various data types as Resources, and A2A Agents could process or generate multimodal content as part of their capabilities. This will enable AI systems to understand and interact with the world in richer, more human-like ways.

Audio

Voice commands, speech synthesis, music, sound analysis.

Visuals

Image recognition, video analysis, chart generation.

Spatial Data

Location awareness, navigation, environmental understanding.

Sensor Data

Input from various sensors, IoT devices, or even affective computing.

Effectively handling diverse data types will allow AI systems to gain a more holistic understanding of their environment and user inputs, leading to more intuitive and capable interactions.

Platformization: Context and Agent Services

We may see the rise of specialized platforms or services for managing context (relevant to MCP) and orchestrating agent interactions (relevant to A2A) across multiple AI systems and applications. An AI application (acting as an MCP Host or an A2A Client Agent) could utilize such a platform, which in turn might abstract complexities of dealing with numerous underlying MCP Servers or A2A Remote Agents.

Figure 8: Conceptual view of a platform offering context and agent services.

Such platforms could provide a centralized approach for organizations to manage context and agent interactions, offering:

  • Shared context and capabilities across diverse AI applications.
  • Aggregated insights from user interactions and agent collaborations.
  • Centralized governance and control over context information and agent behaviors.
  • Scalable infrastructure for managing context and agent interactions across an enterprise.

Key Takeaway

Protocols for AI interaction are evolving towards greater standardization, more sophisticated context and task handling, support for multimodal data, and the emergence of specialized service platforms. Both MCP (for context/tool access) and A2A (for inter-agent collaboration) are part of this evolution. Understanding these trends helps organizations prepare to leverage AI systems that are more aware, capable, and collaborative.

The following sections delve deeper into the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol specifically, before comparing their distinct approaches and potential synergies in building advanced AI solutions.

11. Wrapping Up: MCP and A2A in the AI Future

As we've explored, the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol represent significant advancements in how we build intelligent, interconnected AI systems. MCP standardizes AI access to data and tools, while A2A aims to enable seamless collaboration between independent AI agents.

Key Takeaways

  • MCP - Standardized Context: MCP provides a common language for AI Hosts to consume data (Resources) and capabilities (Tools) from Servers, simplifying development and integration.
  • A2A - Collaborative Agents: A2A is designed to allow distinct AI agents to discover each other, communicate, and work together on complex tasks, fostering an open ecosystem of specialized agents.
  • Enhanced AI Capabilities: MCP empowers individual AI applications with reliable access to external information and functions. A2A extends this by enabling multiple agents to combine their strengths.
  • Improved Interoperability: Both protocols promote better interoperability – MCP between AI and data/tool sources, and A2A between different AI agents themselves.
  • Synergistic Potential: MCP and A2A are complementary. Agents using A2A for collaboration can internally leverage MCP for their specific data and tool interaction needs.
  • Foundation for Future AI: Together, these protocols lay groundwork for more sophisticated, robust, and user-centric AI applications that can handle complex, multi-step processes and leverage diverse capabilities.

The Road Ahead

As MCP and A2A mature and gain adoption, we can anticipate:

  • Growing Ecosystems: More tools, libraries, and pre-built MCP Servers, alongside a burgeoning network of A2A-compatible agents and development frameworks.
  • Standardization Efforts: Potential for wider industry adoption and refinement of these protocols based on real-world use and feedback.
  • Innovative Applications: Emergence of novel AI solutions that leverage standardized context access (MCP) and multi-agent collaboration (A2A) to solve increasingly complex problems.
  • Focus on User Experience: Continued emphasis on ensuring that these powerful backend protocols translate into intuitive, controllable, and beneficial experiences for end-users.

Embracing MCP and A2A

For developers and organizations looking to harness these protocols:

  1. For MCP Implementation:
    • Identify needs for standardized access to data or tools within your AI applications (as an MCP Host).
    • If providing data/tools, consider structuring them as MCP Resources/Tools via an MCP Server.
    • Explore existing MCP libraries and study the official specification at modelcontextprotocol.io.
  2. For A2A Exploration:
    • Study the A2A announcement (e.g., Google Developers Blog) and monitor for the v1.0-alpha release (April 2025).
    • Consider how your existing or future AI agents could benefit from standardized inter-agent communication or how they could offer specialized services to an A2A network.
    • Prepare to engage with the A2A specification and emerging community resources.
  3. Strategic Integration: Evaluate how both protocols can work together in your AI architecture to achieve greater capability and flexibility.

Final Thoughts

The Model Context Protocol and the Agent-to-Agent protocol are pivotal advancements in the AI field. MCP addresses the crucial challenge of standardized context and tool access for individual AI systems, while A2A tackles the equally important domain of inter-agent collaboration.

By offering standard ways to manage these interactions, MCP and A2A empower developers to build AI applications that are more robust, coherent, scalable, and ultimately, more intelligent. As AI continues its rapid evolution, these protocols will be instrumental in shaping a future where AI systems can seamlessly understand their context and collaborate effectively to assist humanity in profound ways.

12. Next Steps 👣

Now that you have a good understanding of the Model Context Protocol (MCP) and the emerging Agent-to-Agent (A2A) protocol, it's time to consider how these concepts can enhance your AI applications. Here are some practical steps for exploring both.

These suggestions are for developers looking to build more capable and interconnected AI systems. Pick the path that best fits your experience and project needs for MCP and keep an eye on A2A developments.

Getting Started with MCP

If you want to use MCP ideas in your applications, here are some recommended steps:

  1. Explore the Official Documentation: Start by visiting the official MCP website at modelcontextprotocol.io. This will give you a solid understanding of the protocol.
  2. Try Tutorials (if available): Look for tutorials on the MCP website or from community resources. Hands-on exercises can help you gain practical experience.
  3. Experiment with Compatible Frameworks: If you use frameworks like LangChain, check if they offer support or integrations for MCP or similar context management and tool-use patterns.
  4. Join or Build the Community: Look for forums or communities discussing MCP. Connecting with other developers, asking questions, and sharing experiences is a great way to learn. If a dedicated MCP community is young, consider helping it grow.
  5. Contribute to the Ecosystem: Think about contributing by developing tools, libraries, or examples if you are building MCP Hosts or Servers. Open-source contributions help any new protocol grow.

Exploring the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) Protocol

With A2A v1.0-alpha anticipated for April 2025, here's how you can prepare and stay informed:

  1. Read the Announcement: Familiarize yourself with the vision and goals of A2A through the Google Developers Blog post.
  2. Monitor Official Channels: Keep an eye on announcements from Google and the A2A-P (Agent-to-Agent Protocol) community for the specification release and any early resources or repositories. (Note: An official A2A-P GitHub group was mentioned in conjunction with the announcement).
  3. Study the Specification (when available): Once the v1.0-alpha specification is released (expected April 2025), dive deep into its details to understand its architecture and capabilities.
  4. Consider Use Cases: Think about how inter-agent communication could benefit your projects or enable new types of applications involving specialized, collaborative agents.
  5. Engage with the Community: As the A2A community forms, participate in discussions, share insights, and learn from others exploring the protocol.

Stay Informed

As protocols like MCP, A2A, and related AI technologies develop, it's useful to keep up with the latest news:

Note: MCP and A2A are evolving protocols. Keep an eye on their official sources (modelcontextprotocol.io for MCP, and Google/A2A-P community announcements for A2A) for the latest updates.

  • Follow Key Organizations: Follow organizations like Anthropic (for MCP), Google (for A2A), and other key players in the AI field.
  • Attend Conferences and Webinars: Take part in AI conferences and online events that discuss context management and how AI systems can work together.
  • Join Standards Discussions: If you are very involved in this area, think about joining groups that are working on standards for context protocols.
  • Experiment with New Releases: As new versions of MCP or related AI technologies are released, try them out to understand what they can do.

Final Encouragement 🚀

Managing context and enabling agent collaboration are fast-moving fields in AI. By learning about and exploring protocols like MCP and A2A, you are helping to lead the way in this exciting area.

Remember that learning and building is a step-by-step process. Start with simple ideas, learn as you go, and then try more complex things. Share what you learn, contribute to open initiatives, and be part of shaping how AI understands, uses context, and collaborates.

We hope this guide has given you useful information for exploring both MCP and A2A in your AI projects. Now it's time to use this knowledge and start building the next wave of intelligent, interconnected AI systems!

Looking for expert guidance with your DevRel initiatives?